They’re Making It Up As They Go Along 

It is well past time that we should just meekly accept the nonsense that our politicians and health officials sprout about vaccines and vaccination status. Here’s how they’ve made it up as they’ve gone along, as each statement has proven to be false:

1. The vaccines are safe and effective
2. The vaccines are more than 90% effective
3. The vaccines will protect you from contracting Covid-19
4. The vaccines will reduce your chances of contracting Covid-19
5. The vaccines will reduce your chances of hospitalization and death
6. The vaccines will reduce the severity of symptoms

Then there is the farce around boosters:

1. Boosters will make the vaccines even more effective and long-lasting
2. You will be eligible for a booster 6 months after having your second dose
3. You will be eligible for a booster 5 months after having your second dose
4. You will be eligible for a booster 4 months after having your second dose
5. You will be eligible for a booster 3 months after having your second dose

We’re Going Backwards, Not Forwards

This additional restriction on freedoms came a whisker over one month since the same restriction was raised from 20 to 30. Does anyone notice that we’re going backwards, not forwards?

Nicola Spurrier said three jabs were needed to achieve the same level of protection against Omicron as two jabs against Delta.

Where on earth does she get that from? Is there even one study she can point to that supports that conclusion? She’s not providing any evidence to back up that claim. This is what health and government officials are doing continuously; they’re making unsubstantiated claims as if they were based on science or supporting data.

Early Data Is Not What They Want

There is a danger that the wrong conclusion may be drawn when there is insufficient data for reliability.

Back on Boxing Day, when Spurrier and Marshall said we have to jab like our lives depend on it, there were three people in intensive care. Two were vaccinated, one was vaccine-free.

Does that stat suggest that vaccinated people are twice as likely to end up in intensive care as vaccine-free? Of course not. The sample is too low.

At the same time, there were seven other people in the Covid ward, none of whom were vaccinated. Does that stat suggest that only vaccination-free people are likely to end up in hospital? Of course not. The sample is still too low. But not too low for Nicola:

“Even though these are small numbers (of) people that have been hospitalised, there is a high representation of people that are not vaccinated.”

Again, at this time, 84% of the State’s new cases were vaccinated, 16% were vaccine-free. That mirrored the State’s vaccination rate. The only conclusion to be drawn from that – if you think the number of cases is high enough to be representative – is that the vaccines don’t stop you from becoming infected.

That sort of data is not what they want.

It is also worth remembering that the new cases in this State only started to climb after 23rd November, when the borders were opened to vaccinated people (but remained closed to vaccine-free people). The inescapable conclusion to be drawn from that, is that it is the vaccinated who started the transmission. Still care to argue that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated?

Government Propaganda

I, along with presumably thousands of other households, received this flyer in the mail (despite the “No Advertising Material” sign on the letterbox):

1. “Covid-19 vaccines have been tested, reviewed and approved in exactly the same way as all other vaccines.”
   That’s not a fact. That’s a lie.
2. “Covid-19 vaccines are close to 90% effective in reducing symptoms and preventing hospitalisation and death.”
   That’s not a fact. It’s completely false. (If it were true, why would they be pumping boosters into you four times a year?)
3. “Vaccines do not have late onset side effects and Covid-19 vaccines are no different.”
   That’s not a fact. It’s wishful thinking. There is no way they can know about late onset side effects of Covid-19 vaccines. Studies weren’t done on this. (see no.1)
4. “Fertility issues are not a side effect of any vaccine, including Covid-19 vaccines.”
   That’s not a fact. Again, It’s wishful thinking. There is no way they can know about fertility issues caused by Covid-19 vaccines. Studies weren’t done on this, either. (see no.1) However, studies that are currently being undertaken are indicating that there could well be a link between the vaccine and fertility issues. Further, data that is now being compiled suggest there is a link between the vaccines and miscarriage. (Ref 1, Ref 2 and Ref 3)

Booster Shots Are Coming At Shorter Intervals

The time frame for booster shots will be brought forward on 4th January to four months after your second dose and will then be brought down again on 31st January to three months. Where is the rationale behind this? If a booster is required every three months, then why not bring it down to 3 months straight away?

Einstein said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. They’re not just doing the same thing; they’re doing it quicker and quicker.

So while you’re standing in line for your next booster shot, ask yourself this question: If you had to have a vaccination plus 4 booster shots for the seasonal flu, would you? And do you think you might question how effective it really is?

It is not just well past time that we should stop accepting the nonsense that our politicians and health officials say about vaccines and vaccination status.

It’s time to call them out on it: Liar, liar. Pants on fire.