By Tim Ellis, 22nd June, 2022
Episode 32
Some “fact-checker” sites have all the credibility of a monkey presenting a doctoral dissertation. Other sites appear much more credible, yet their “verdict” often appears to misrepresent or distort facts in order to present a pre-determined outcome.
References
Ref 1 – Lund University Study – https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/lup/publication/ad4c0fbc-8aa9-44ef-895e-e220fdaa7e87
Ref 2 – Lund University Q&A with study authors https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/qa-covid-19-vaccine-study-gains-attention
Ref 3 – PubMed article – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
Listen Offline
To download this recording and listen offline, right-click HERE and click on “Save link as…”
Recap & Takeaways
Many fact-checkers have their own agenda, fact-checking not being part of the agenda
Designed To Make Money
What The Lund Study Showed
Fact Checking Is Important. But…
Start Listening Today!
Podcasts across a range of categories, including Covid-19, Government, Corporations, Agencies, Health and Food.
At any time, if you want reference resources for this podcast, including graphs, charts and links, head across to our Articles page for transcripts.
