In The Aftermath Of The Pandemic – A Personal Perspective
US President Joe Biden has declared the pandemic is over. I guess that means we’re in a post-pandemic world, now. And we get to cope with the aftermath of the pandemic.
I get quite upset when I hear about problems that result from SARS-CoV-2. This is not just hospitalisations and deaths from the disease, nor just side-effects – including deaths from the jabs. (Is death a side effect?)
It includes the economic, financial, social and health impacts of lockdowns, masks and social distancing (a contradiction in terms, wouldn’t you say?). Those impacts were both immediate and ongoing.
The sad truth is that most of them were completely avoidable.
So Many Adverse Reactions To Covid Jabs
I have heard much about serious side effects following jabs. I consider myself lucky, in that I have been largely untouched. I haven’t lost any family members or close friends.
My partner’s children are all jabbed and have suffered no obvious major problems so far.
Then I think of my brother and his wife. I don’t know what his wife thinks of vaccines generally, nor the covid jabs in particular. She was required to be jabbed for her work, but she would have been jabbed anyway. Speaking with her, that was a fear response from the propaganda, as I suspect it was for many, many people.
My brother has said in the past that vaccines are very, very safe, so I assume he had no objection to being jabbed. As it happened, he had an overseas contract for which he needed to be jabbed. Otherwise, he says, he wouldn’t have bothered. As far as I know, they have had no problems.
My sister and her tribe all seem to have been coerced into getting jabbed for various reasons. There is no question that since the jabs, her husband, Bill, is having problems that show no sign of ending anytime soon. They are seriously concerning. Would you call continuing small strokes severe?
My eldest brother, with his litany of problems – heart and brain – has also been very concerning. I was extremely anxious when he informed the family that he was going to get jabbed. They all knew my stance on this issue, so they understood why. But, of course, we all make decisions we believe to be in our best interest and should be allowed to do so. If they turn out to be wrong, then we should expect love and support.
EVIDENCE IS MOUNTING THAT COVID JABS HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON OUR IMMUNE SYSTEM
When I think of my brother and brother-in-law, I realise I’m not completely untouched. (This is without considering the matter of transfection, which occurs regardless of any decision to remain jab-free.) Of course, as has been pointed out to me, there is no proof that any of their problems are covid jab-related. And they may not be.
The jab could have had no impact.
Their problems could have been exacerbated by the jab.
The jab could be the catalyst for a latent problem.
Their problems could be caused directly by the jab.
This first one is the least likely. Anecdotal and empirical evidence is mounting that the jabs have a negative effect on our immune system, making us more susceptible to everything, including covid-19. And since the jabs don’t stop infection or transmission…well, the situation drips with irony as thick as molasses.
Regardless, we don’t know which of those four possibilities is the cause of their problems. The thing is – as my sister says – we will never know. This is because no-one is investigating. And why is that?
Why Are Adverse Reactions Not Being Investigated?
Simply put, it’s because the problems are not reported to the people who should be investigating. That they may not want to investigate, or would be unable to cope with the volume of investigations required is not the point. I have asked my sister and a niece if Bill’s problems were reported to the Database of Adverse Event Notifications – DAEN. Nope. I’ve asked people I know who have had problems, if they were reported to DAEN. Nope.
The issue here has a couple of layers. I have heard from different people that when problems were reported to their GP, it was not considered that the jabs might have some causal connection. I have also heard that when questioned directly if the jab could be the problem, some GPs have dismissed the possibility. On what medical basis, I don’t know. But I can guess.
The Process Of Reporting Adverse Reactions Is A Disincentive To Report
Completing a report to DAEN is time-consuming, and most GPs are on the clock. Time is money, people. Especially if they bulk bill. There is both a lack of causal awareness and a reluctance, then, for GPs to report.
Individuals Can Report Adverse Events
Many people don’t realise they can lodge reports to DAEN themselves. The reports do not have to be made by people with medical certification. For those that do lodge, the lodgement process can seem to be more trouble than it’s worth. It may be intimidating for some, beyond their computer skills for others.
The UK has its own reporting system, the Yellow Card system. Sounds a bit like a football match to me. But the same comments I have made about reporting here in Australia apply to the UK, as well as VAERS in the US and, I expect, European equivalents, etc.
TO NOT REPORT ADVERSE REACTIONS IS NEGLIGENCE
“The Greater Good” Works Both Ways
I have to ask: If individuals are expected to get jabbed “for the greater good,” then shouldn’t that same expectation apply to reporting and investigating problems with the jabs for exactly the same reason? And as the first tenet of medicine is “first do no harm,” then shouldn’t everyone involved in the medical profession and public health be taking action on this?
To not do so is negligence. Or more accurately, malfeasance.
And now, we move forward. Back to normal. But it’s not how things used to be. It’s described as “the new normal.” In some ways, close enough not to recognise the difference. But look closer.
The Aftermath Of The Pandemic
In the wake of government measures to counter SARS-CoV-2 – completely ineffectual, in the end:
- we are left with a multitude of small businesses having been set back financially by years
- we have a multitude of small businesses losing everything and closing their doors forever
- we have supply problems we have an unprecedented government deficit
- we have accelerating inflation
- we have artificially inflated real estate prices, making ownership more difficult
- we have an increase in interest rates not seen for 40 years
- we have accelerating energy prices
- we have unprecedented devaluation of buying power
- we are left with spikes in anxiety depression suicide
- we saw delays in early diagnosis and treatment of serious diseases that has been, and will continue to be, to the detriment of thousands
- we saw old people dying scared and alone, with their families denied access
Authorities Will Not Want To Relinquish Their New Powers
On top of this, we have State governments that have exercised emergency powers recklessly, assuming powers that they will be loathe to relinquish. Public service bureaucrats have been riding on their coat-tails, very quickly learning how it is done in this Brave New World.
We have seen public health departments peddling disinformation and – in the end – lies relentlessly.
We have seen coercion.
We have seen censorship.
We have seen early treatment for Covid deliberately denied
WE HAVE A POPULATION INFUSED WITH FEAR AND CONDITIONED INTO COMPLIANCE
DO THE COVID-19 JABS STOP INFECTION OR TRANSMISSION?
There have been many studies conducted into both infection and transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Some studies show that they stop or slow infection rates. Others show they do not. Some studies show they are effective in preventing transmission. Others show they are not.
It is important to recognise that many studies are conducted by people who are paid by entities with a vested interest in the outcome. Sadly, as eminent cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra puts it, evidence-based medicine has been hijacked. (Ref 1)
MercoPress, the South Atlantic News Agency, in a report as early as 30th December, 2020, (Ref 2) headlined:
“WHO warns vaccines have yet to prove they are effective at preventing Covid-19 transmission.”
“Chief scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan said the WHO hasn’t yet determined whether the approved vaccines being administered in Canada, the U.S. and Europe are effective at preventing transmission.
“I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on,” Swaminathan said.
That was from the early days. More recent was an article by Chris Stokel that appeared in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) on 4th February, 2022 (Ref 3), who wrote:
“Vaccines aren’t preventing onward transmission by reducing the viral load—or amount of SARS-CoV-2—in your body.
‘Most studies show if you got an infection after vaccination, compared with someone who got an infection without a vaccine, you were pretty much shedding roughly the same amount of virus,’ says Paul Hunter, professor in medicine at the University of East Anglia.
One study, sponsored by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), found ‘no difference in infectious virus titer between groups’ who had been vaccinated and had not.”
From the US National Institutes Of Health (NIH) dated 30th September, 2021 (Ref 4):
Headline: “Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States”
Findings: “At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days.
In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days.
The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.”
Government departments and agencies still pushed, “Help Stop The Spread.” Why did they get think the jabs stopped transmission?
Moderna chief medical officer, Dr Tal Zaks is on the record as saying their jab hasn’t been proven to stop the virus from spreading. (Ref 5) Similarly, Janine Small, Global President of Emerging Markets at Pfizer, despite having difficulty differentiating between ‘transmission’ and ‘immunisation,’ testified in the European Union parliament that was never tested before going to market. (Ref 6)
I have cherry-picked articles to support my assertions, although I didn’t have to search for even a minute to find such articles. I didn’t mention, though, that the BMJ article above states that the jabs don’t prevent transmission, but argues that they do help prevent infection, contrary to my assertion.
Don’t Simply Accept Assertions. Question If They Make Sense
Why do I mention this? Because you will always find conflicting information if you take the trouble to look for it, especially around Covid-19. So what to do? Two simple things:
- Look for data, preferably raw data.
- Don’t accept assertions without measuring them against things you know. Look at them critically.
The SA Dashboard provides daily information on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions and deaths. Back in May, 2022 they stopped providing information on how many of these cases were fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated and unvaccinated. This was shortly after time it was obvious that the statistics did not support the narrative.
South Australia and Western Australia were two States that had very low SARS-CoV-2 infection levels while they had their borders closed. When SA opened its borders, it had a 93% “fully vaccinated” population and only 4 cases. Only those who were “fully vaccinated” were allowed in. Almost immediately, the general populace started to become infected. Within weeks, there were thousands of infections per day. The obvious conclusion is that it had to be the “vaccinated” who were spreading the virus and that the jabs weren’t stopping transmission or infections.
WA followed an identical path, with identical results.
Covid Jabs Only Have Provisional Approval
Don’t forget the covid jabs are still only provisionally approved in Australia. This provisional approval was given due to the declared emergency. They have been pushed on people who never needed them. The emergency is over, yet these experimental drugs are still being pushed, despite full knowledge that they do not work. Throughout this article, I have not referred to the jabs as vaccines. That’s because they’re not. They don’t stop infection or transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Still some people are lining up for their 4th or 5th jab, such is the power of the propaganda peddled by our authorities. There is a legacy for these actions.
Possibly worst of all, we have a population infused with fear and conditioned into compliance.
We have seen the biggest betrayal by parliament of its citizens in history. This betrayal was perpetrated by State governments of both colours, with the support of the opposition. Both Labour and the Coalition carry responsibility.
And we will be paying for this betrayal long into the future.
Scroll for comments
Ref 1 – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDXOArxFAGQ
Ref 2 – MercoPress – https://en.mercopress.com/2020/12/30/who-warns-vaccines-have-yet-to-prove-that-they-are-effective-at-preventing-covid-19-transmission
Ref 3 – BMJ – https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o298
Ref 4 – NIH – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/
Ref 5 – NY Post – https://nypost.com/2020/11/24/moderna-boss-says-covid-shot-not-proven-to-stop-virus-spread/
Ref 6 – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnxlxzxoZx0